Connect with us
728x90 banner available here

Latest News

Player Complaints Policy Guidelines Version 1.1 18th June 2025

Published

on

Reading Time: 8 minutes

1 Policy Overview

This Complaints Policy outlines the framework for managing player complaints and disputes, ensuring a transparent, fair, and efficient process in alignment with the requirements under Article 5.3 of the National Ordinance on Games of Chance (Landsverordening op de kansspelen, “LOK”).

Adherence to this Complaints Policy is considered a requirement under the LOK, and failure to comply will be addressed by the Curacao Gaming Authority (CGA) in accordance with its supervision, monitoring and enforcement procedures.

The Complaints Policy guarantees players access to a straightforward and effective complaint and dispute resolution process, including free alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services that prioritize quality and independence.

In accordance with Article 5.3 of the LOK, further rules, policies and guidelines regarding complaints and ADR processes may be established and implemented from time to time. These will be published and made available on the CGA website.

• The operator’s player complaints policy must be clearly included or referenced in the operator’s Terms and Conditions. It must include details of all Stages of Complaint Resolution (Clause 3.2)

  • The operator may, at its own discretion, publish the policy as a “standalone” document with link(s) from the website homepage and/or registration page.
  • The operator may, at its own discretion and subject to compliance with applicable private law, require the player to explicitly confirm acceptance of the Complaints policy in any way including a tick box, popup or email.
  • The operator may, at its own discretion, include acceptance of the Complaints policy as part of its registration process.

This Complaints Policy is based on regulatory requirements under the LOK. It does not affect or override the applicable rules of private law, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Book 6 of the Civil Code of Curaçao concerning general terms and conditions. Operators remain responsible for ensuring compliance with all relevant civil law obligations independently of this policy. They are expected to seek appropriate legal advice to ensure that their complaints procedures and terms and conditions conform to private law requirements.

2 Definitions

2.1 Player Interaction

Any written communication initiated by a player and directed to the operator’s customer service team. This includes general enquiries, feedback, or requests for information, assistance, or clarification.

2.2 Complaint

A Complaint is a written expression of dissatisfaction by a player relating to the operator’s services, decisions, terms, or conduct, which indicates the player is unhappy and expects a response or resolution. For the purpose of Reporting requirements (Clause 6) a complaint is when a Complaint Submission Form (Clause 3.2 paragraph 3) has been submitted by the player to the operator and/or a complaint has been escalated to ADR.

2.3 Dispute

A complaint that has not been resolved to the player’s satisfaction through the internal complaints process and has been escalated, either within the organisation or to an independent third party (e.g. an ADR provider or court of law).

3 Complaint Submission Process

3.1 Complaint Window

1. This Complaints Policy applies to all players of operators licensed under the LOK from the date of licence issuance, and to all operators licensed under the NOOGH regime from the moment they were issued a green or orange dynamic seal.

2. Players may lodge a complaint free of charge at any time up to six months of the settlement of the bet or the incident about which they are making a complaint.

3. In the case of P2P (such as poker) or ante post fixed odds betting the six month clock begins after the bet settlement or conclusion of a specific event rather than the placement of the wager.

4. In the case of complaints about in-running sports betting, customers must be advised that while they may submit a complaint within six months, prompt action may be necessary if the investigation may depend on data specific to the complaint which — due to the nature of inrunning betting — may no longer be available after a short period, insofar as the operator cannot reasonably be expected to preserve such data any longer…

3.2 Stages/Escalation of Complaint Resolution

1. Complaints can only be made by the registered player. Article 1.3 section c of the LOK mandates that a player is not allowed to sell, donate, rent out, lease, pawn, or pledge, under any title, any of their claims against the holder of a gaming license from the CGA.

2. In the first instance the operator must offer customer support via email and/or live chat.

3. An official Complaint Submission Form must be available to the player.

a. This form must be either a downloadable form that can be completed and emailed or otherwise uploaded by the player, and/or a form that is fully completed and submitted online.

b. The form must include at a minimum the following sections

i. Complainant’s name, address, and place of residence.

ii. Complainant’s account number (if applicable) iii. Date of the complaint and date of the disputed event.

iv. Description of the conduct being disputed (using a selection of predetermined category topics if/as applicable).

c. The form must be available in English and in the language of the website/domain that the player is using.

d. The operator may request supporting documentation the player requires to include as part of the complaint. Any additional information or documentation requested by the operator must be a reasonable in the context of complaint resolution.

4. The operator must offer an ADR option for the players, subject to the requirements of Clause

5.

5. Except if mutually agreed under specific terms of ADR (Clause 5), the operator must not restrict the rights of the player him/herself to take legal action.

3.3 Role of the CGA

1. It is the responsibly of the operator to make the role of the CGA clear to the player in the Terms and Conditions.

2. The CGA will not resolve or make decisions on any player complaints regarding gamblingrelated transactions on the operator’s website(s).

3. Unless deemed to be inadequately handled, the decisions made by the operator and/or ADR provider will not be subject to reviewing and/or overturning by the CGA

4. Notwithstanding 2. and 3. above the operator must not restrict the player’s ability to contact the CGA directly with regard to matters including but not limited to malpractice, breach of license conditions or whistleblowing.

5. While the CGA does not mediate in individual disputes it will use the information to support its supervisory and enforcement actions.

4 Complaint Resolution Process

4.1 Timeline: Responsible Gaming Complaints

Complaints related to responsible gaming should be prioritized due to potential impacts on player well-being. Complaints should be categorized as related to responsible gaming in any case when it regards targeting of Vulnerable Players, the availability and/or timely implementation of self-exclusion and/or cooling-off and the mandated consequences therein as outlined in the Responsible Gaming policy.

Operators must use best in efforts to resolve these cases within five business days.

Within two days of receiving a complaint, the operator will:

• Confirm receipt of the complaint in writing.

• Provide an explanation of how the complaint will be processed.

• Provide notice of the average timeline for resolution of such complaints.

If more time is needed by the operator to make a reasonable and informed decision, players must be informed of the delay, which cannot exceed two weeks. If a delay is due to a lack of or a slow response from the player, the resolution period may be extended by no more than a further two weeks.

4.2 Timeline: All Other Complaint Types

The operator will assess and respond to complaints within four weeks. If necessary, due to complexity or lack of information, this period may be extended once by an additional four weeks, with prior written notice to the player.

Within one week of receiving a complaint, the operator will:

• Confirm receipt of the complaint in writing.

• Provide an explanation of how the complaint will be processed.

• Provide notice of the average timeline for resolution of such complaints.

4.3 Response and Resolution

A player will always receive a final determination of their complaint in writing.

The response will be either:

1. A reasoned final assessment of the outcome/resolution of the complaint with supporting evidence if necessary or applicable.

2. Detailed reasons for not handling the complaint. If additional information is reasonably required to address the complaint fully, the operator must have requested this information within the initial four week time period. Should the complainant not provide the necessary information within that time period, the operator may reject the complaint.

3. If the player is unsatisfied with the resolution and makes a further complaint to that effect, the player is informed that they may escalate the matter to an independent ADR entity.

4.4 Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The use of AI is permissible under this Complaints Policy Guideline subject to the following terms:

1. Once a player complaint has been identified as pertaining to Responsible Gaming

(Clause 4.1), communications with the player should be conducted by a human, not AI.

2. Complaints that can be reasonably considered as complex should be dealt with by a human, not AI.

3. The AI records must be monitored to ensure that they are reasonable in their solutions/recommendations and consistent across players with like-for-like complaints.

5 Alternative Dispute Resolution

In order to be compliant with their license conditions as mandated by LOK, each licensed operator must offer independent ADR services to their players in accordance with the ADR Policy.

1. Full details of the ADR process must be included in the operator’s Terms and Conditions.

2. Operators must have uploaded to the CGA Portal an agreement with at least one CGA Certified ADR entity, within one month of the publication of the Certified ADR Providers on the official website.

3. If a complaint cannot be resolved internally, players are entitled to escalate the matter to an independent ADR provider, free of charge. For avoidance of doubt, the operator will bear all costs of the ADR process.

4. Once ADR process is completed it cannot be recommenced by either the player or the operator with another different ADR entity.

5. In the event that the player drops out of the ADR process (but it has already begun) – it should be noted the player should not have the right to resurface the dispute in the future.

6. Provision of ADR services by the operator is mandatory. If the operator sets ADR parameters in order to prevent abuse (such as whether ADR must be undertaken before a player can initiate legal proceedings, the binding nature of the ADR outcome on the player, or whether there is a minimum claim value required for escalation to ADR), the CGA advises the operator to carefully consider these conditions and seek independent legal advice regarding any applicable civil legislation.

Furthermore, the CGA will take all relevant circumstances into account when assessing whether the operator’s measures to prevent abuse are justified. For example, the CGA may understand that in cases involving very low-value claims there may be a legitimate concern about potential misuse.

At the same time, each case must be assessed on its own merits. For instance, if a claim concerns the admission of a self-excluded person, the CGA expects the matter to be taken seriously, regardless of the monetary value involved.

6 Record-Keeping and Reporting

The operator will:

1. Submit reports to the CGA on January 15th and June 15th based on complaints submitted to the operator since the previous reporting period by players using the Complaints Submission Form. The first reports become due in January 2026.

2. The report will summarise the following:

a. Total number of complaints made.

b. Total number of settled complaints (upheld and rejected).

c. Number of pending or unresolved complaints.

d. Number of complaints by category.

e. Number referred to ADR.

f. Number and detail of complaints for which a player has taken legal action.

3. Ensure transparency and compliance with ADR decisions and regulatory updates.

4. ADR service providers will have their own reporting requirements in accordance with the Alternative Dispute Resolution policy issued by the CGA.

5. Records of unresolved complaints and/or complaints that have been escalated to ADR or legal proceedings will be kept for the lesser of five years or the relevant time stipulated by data protection, statute of limitations or other relevant laws or guidelines.

6. The CGA reserves the right to request, at any time, access to records of complaints received as well as any disputes that are pending resolution.

7 Terms and Conditions

The Complaints procedure statement will be visible and accessible on the operator’s website as a standalone link or document.

The Complaints procedure will also be clearly outlined in the Terms and Conditions.

Information provided will include at a minimum:

1. Links to customer service and information on how to contact the operator.

2. Detail of information required for a player to make a complaint and links to either/both either the online form or the downloadable PDF/Word document.

3. Timelines for responses and resolution.

4. Player rights to complain including explicit rights to ADR services and regulatory escalation.

5. An explanation of the potential consequences of the relevant ADR entity’s decision, and the manner in which this will affect the player’s right to further legal and judicial recourse.

6. Details of the ADR process and player rights.

7. Contact information for the ADR provider(s)

8. Clear information that the CGA does not mediate in individual disputes, but if the player feels the operator is in breach of regulations that the player may contact the CGA.

8 Reasons for Complaint

The player has the right to make a complaint regarding any part of their relationship with the operator, or any incident related to their participation in a game of chance. This includes (but is not limited to):

1. Deposit issues

2. Withdrawal issues

3. Bonus terms and conditions

4. Account closures or restrictions

5. Alleged errors or unfairness in game outcomes

6. Responsible gaming issues

7. Treatment of player balances

8. KYC and Verification

9. Data Protection

10. Technical or Software issues

11. AML concerns

12. Issues with minors

13. Fraudulent games

14. Fraudulent practices

15. License or regulation

16. Unfair terms and conditions

9 Transition Deadline

The Complaints Policy must be uploaded to the CGA Portal no later than 31st July 2025.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post Player Complaints Policy Guidelines Version 1.1 18th June 2025 appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.

George Miller (Gyorgy Molnar) started his career in content marketing and has started working as an Editor/Content Manager for our company in 2016. George has acquired many experiences when it comes to interviews and newsworthy content becoming Head of Content in 2017. He is responsible for the news being shared on multiple websites that are part of the European Gaming Media Network.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Prague Gaming & TECH Summit 2025 (25-26 March)
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Latest News

‘PAGCOR GUARANTEE’ SITE, PANANGGA KONTRA BOGUS ONLINE GAMES

Published

on

Reading Time: < 1 minute

 

“This new website will help our players easily identify and verify whether the online gaming sites are duly licensed before playing or making any payments,” ani PAGCOR Chairman at CEO Alejandro H. Tengco.

“By providing the public with a quick and accessible way to check a site’s legitimacy, we are empowering them to make informed decisions and avoid falling victim to fraudsters and scammers,”

“Illegal online gaming sites not only endanger players but also erode public trust and deprive the government of vital revenues,” giit ni G. Tengco. “The PAGCOR Guarantee is a key component of our regulatory framework to protect both the industry and the Filipino people.”

 

The post ‘PAGCOR GUARANTEE’ SITE, PANANGGA KONTRA BOGUS ONLINE GAMES appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Inspired Entertainment and BetMGM Launch Hybrid Dealer® Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet

Published

on

Reading Time: 2 minutes

 

First US Deployment of Hybrid Dealer Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet

Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (“Inspired” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: INSE), a leading provider of B2B gaming content, systems, and solutions, is pleased to announce that BetMGM, a leading iGaming and sports betting operator, is the first in the United States to introduce the innovative Hybrid Dealer Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet game, under a three-month exclusive agreement.

Inspired’s Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet is an integral part of the Hybrid Dealer portfolio, blending original game design with patented technology to create an innovative roulette experience. This game introduces a unique twist—4-Ball Extra Bets—offering players brand new wagering options with potential payouts reaching up to 500/1.

The 4-Ball Extra Bet adds four additional balls on a new inner wheel, allowing players to place side bets on a color match between the inner and outer wheels. Bets can be placed via the standard roulette table, a neighbor bets table, or through a dedicated special bets interface that includes features such as hot and cold numbers.

Hybrid Dealer is a patented, game-changing online product category that offers players a rich casino and game show content experience without the challenges typically associated with live-dealer products. This technology combines the excitement of a live casino environment with the efficiency and consistency of CGI and pre-recorded hosts, delivering a reliable and engaging gaming experience.

The Hybrid Dealer platform is a patented innovation that has already gained recognition for its ability to replicate the thrill of a live casino while providing operational advantages. Hybrid Dealer Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet is the third game launched within this innovative portfolio, featuring stunning Virtual CGI visuals and pre-recorded hosts.

Throughout gameplay, Hybrid Dealer technology ensures ultra-realistic action and smooth visual transitions, creating an environment that closely resembles a live casino experience. The game also incorporates social engagement features, including big win leaderboards and a quick chat function, fostering a lively, community-oriented atmosphere.

Available across online and mobile platforms around the world, Hybrid Dealer Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet is poised to set a new standard in digital roulette gaming—combining innovation, realism, and social interaction.

Brooks Pierce, President and CEO of Inspired Entertainment, said: “We are excited to partner again with BetMGM to bring the first US deployment of our groundbreaking Hybrid Dealer Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet. This game exemplifies our commitment to delivering innovative, engaging gaming experiences that captivate players and support our partners’ growth in the digital space.”

Oliver Bartlett, VP of Gaming, BetMGM, said, “Partnering with Inspired to introduce Hybrid Dealer Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet marks an important milestone for us in delivering innovative gaming experiences to our players. This game’s immersive visuals and unique betting features will undoubtedly enhance our online casino offering and set a new standard for digital roulette.”

 

The post Inspired Entertainment and BetMGM Launch Hybrid Dealer® Roulette 4-Ball Extra Bet appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Connor Williams: ‘iGB L!VE is critical in encouraging more collaboration, challenging tired thinking, and charting a path forward for the industry.’

Published

on

Reading Time: 3 minutes

 

Connor Williams has been a director at Velo Capital Partners for more than 6 years, managing over 35 portfolio companies including the likes of Oddin, WinZO, and Novig.

His core thematic focuses include next gen casino content, B2C regulatory arbitrage, and the ‘gamblification” of mass market sectors such as video gaming and finance. He explains why Pitch iGB is critical to the industry, the impact of over-regulation on innovation and the importance of keeping a ‘fresh mind’.

You are part of the judging panel for Pitch iGB – how important do you think it is for the industry to come together and support new entrepreneurial businesses?

CW: The Pitch iGB competition is one of the key routes to democratising startup investing in the sector which is critical in unearthing new and disruptive businesses. This is even more critical to developed regions like the UK where innovation opportunities can be overlooked in the service of “safe and consistent”.

What are you looking for in terms of entries – what constitutes a winning submission?

CW: As a VC investor we target outsized returns on our investment for the early stage risk that we take. This means a winning submission needs to be swinging for the fences in terms of both scalability and disruption. Product is currently quite stale, user experience is far from being optimised, and over-regulation is stymying the incumbents and that’s where the opportunity lies.

In your experience how difficult is it for iGaming businesses to secure funding from the mainstream banking sector?

CW: The banking sector is risk constrained from a number of different angles and this is important to understand in the context of available funding for iGaming. That being said, the fintech sector at large is very keen to engage more with our sector, especially around payments. External funding in iGaming in general is more difficult to obtain, this holds true for listed businesses as well as startups, partially due to structural restrictions within the finance sector and partly due to a history of several bad actors on the operator side that the industry has yet to overcome. I think this challenge represents a specific opportunity for in-sector speciality lending not dissimilar to user acquisition financing businesses in the consumer and video gaming sectors.

How does the event contribute to the health of the industry: what do businesses gain from participating in iGB L!VE?

CW: Our sector is one that has historically been a bit disconnected, particularly at the large operator and supplier level. These events are critical in encouraging more collaboration, challenging tired thinking, and charting a path forward for the industry that (in my view) eventually needs to lead to the mass market the way the likes of online consumer and fintech businesses have. In order to achieve this the industry needs to be able to demonstrate that tech is now at a place where players can be almost completely insulated from player harm; and operators need to finally embrace this as the days of high staking whales (in regulated markets like the UK) are clearly coming to an end.

How would you describe the iGB L!VE experience – what does it deliver?

CW: iGB is like a cheat-sheet for all the latest happenings in the gaming sector, it’s an amazing opportunity to catch up with colleagues and meet new players in the market. In addition, one gets the latest insights of the industry’s thought leaders that you won’t get without travelling outside of the country.

In your view what are the main trends and technologies impacting the industry and that will be evident on the iGB L!VE show floor?

CW: The industry is currently reeling from a combination of over-regulation and over-taxation. This has lead to two predominant trends in regulated markets: a decisive shift to the black market and the rise of crypto solutions (the two not being wholly mutually exclusive). B2B tech is largely solved at this stage and is seeing a retreat due to the failure of B2B incumbents to innovate sufficiently, while services and content are still exciting places to cast an eye in the vertical. Specifically on the content side, we are seeing many operators attempt to shift this in-house (with limited success to date) which is seeing content providers shifting more towards innovation in content that is starting to cross into casual mobile gaming mechanics. AI remains a sector that iGaming is significantly behind other industries on and I am hoping we hear more about shifts towards agentic thinking, scalable solutions to sub-par AI art/animation/content to-date, and more ambitious pushes towards long term value drivers (such as bespoke gambling LLMs and innovation around classical model training loops).

How important is it that iGB L!VE is taking place in London a city regarded as being the home of iGaming?

CW: iGB is critical for visitors as the major industry event in the UK. As a market that is highly regulated and developed, iGB is critical to help one keep a fresh mind on industry trends and meet new entrants that are changing the rules of the game.

 

The post Connor Williams: ‘iGB L!VE is critical in encouraging more collaboration, challenging tired thinking, and charting a path forward for the industry.’ appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.

Continue Reading

Trending

EEGaming.org is part of HIPTHER, parent brand of various prominent news outlets and international conferences. These platforms and events span a wide range of industries, including Entertainment, Technology, Gaming and Gambling, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, Quantum Technology, Legal Cannabis, Health and Lifestyle, VR/AR, eSports, and several others. This indicates that EEGaming.org is part of a larger network that focuses on a diverse array of sectors, particularly those related to cutting-edge technology and modern lifestyle trends.

Contact us: [email protected]

Editorial / PR Submissions: [email protected]

Copyright © 2015 - 2025 HIPTHER. All Rights Reserved. Registered in Romania under Proshirt SRL, Company number: 2134306, EU VAT ID: RO21343605. Office address: Blvd. 1 Decembrie 1918 nr.5, Targu Mures, Romania

We are constantly showing banners about important news regarding events and product launches. Please turn AdBlock off in order to see these areas.